GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship model for the era of long-horizon tasks. With a truly usable 1M-token context window, it can handle project-level engineering context, execute long-running tasks more reliably, follow engineering standards more consistently, and complete the full development workflow from requirements to multi-platform deployment in a single task.
GLM 5.2 vs Qwen3.6 27B
Compare GLM 5.2 from Z.AI and Qwen3.6 27B from Qwen on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.
GLM 5.2The Qwen3.6 series 27B native vision-language Dense model. Compared with the 3.5-27B, the model notably improves Agentic coding capability and further enhances STEM and reasoning abilities; on the visual modality side, spatial intelligence, object localization and detection capabilities are significantly strengthened, and video understanding, document OCR, and visual agent capabilities have steadily improved.
Pricing & Specifications
Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.
Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.
Activity Past 30 Days
Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.
Tokens / day
Requests / day
Performance Past 3 Days
Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.
Throughput (tok/s)
TTFT (s)
Uptime (%)
Cost calculator
Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.
Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.
FAQ
Which is cheaper: GLM 5.2, Qwen3.6 27B?
Qwen3.6 27B: $2.53/M output tokens; GLM 5.2: $3.94/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.
Which responds faster?
Qwen3.6 27B: 1.0s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.
How large is each context window?
GLM 5.2 accepts 1,000,000 and Qwen3.6 27B accepts 254,000 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on GLM 5.2 and 64,000 tokens on Qwen3.6 27B.
Which one generates tokens faster?
Qwen3.6 27B at 41.0 tok/s and GLM 5.2 at 33.5 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.
What inputs and capabilities does each model support?
GLM 5.2 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Qwen3.6 27B accepts text, image and video input and supports tool calling, function calling, structured outputs, web search, long context and thinking.
Can I call GLM 5.2 and Qwen3.6 27B with the same API key?
Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.
Popular comparisons
Related model match-ups readers also look at.
