GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship model for the era of long-horizon tasks. With a truly usable 1M-token context window, it can handle project-level engineering context, execute long-running tasks more reliably, follow engineering standards more consistently, and complete the full development workflow from requirements to multi-platform deployment in a single task.
GLM 5.2 vs Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed
Compare GLM 5.2 from Z.AI and Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed from Moonshot AI on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.
GLM 5.2High-Speed version of Kimi K2.7 Code model, with output speed of approximately 180 Tokens/s and up to 260 Tokens/s in short context scenarios, delivering a more extreme coding experience.
Pricing & Specifications
Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.
Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.
Activity Past 30 Days
Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.
Tokens / day
Requests / day
Performance Past 3 Days
Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.
Throughput (tok/s)
TTFT (s)
Uptime (%)
Cost calculator
Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.
Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.
FAQ
Which is cheaper: GLM 5.2, Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed?
GLM 5.2: $3.94/M output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed: $8.00/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.
Which responds faster?
GLM 5.2: 1.1s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.
How large is each context window?
GLM 5.2 accepts 1,000,000 and Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed accepts 262,144 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on GLM 5.2 and 32,768 tokens on Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed.
Which one generates tokens faster?
Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed at 55.0 tok/s and GLM 5.2 at 33.7 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.
What inputs and capabilities does each model support?
GLM 5.2 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed accepts text, image and video input and supports thinking, function calling and structured outputs.
Can I call GLM 5.2 and Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed with the same API key?
Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.
Popular comparisons
Related model match-ups readers also look at.
