GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship model for the era of long-horizon tasks. With a truly usable 1M-token context window, it can handle project-level engineering context, execute long-running tasks more reliably, follow engineering standards more consistently, and complete the full development workflow from requirements to multi-platform deployment in a single task.
GLM 5.2 vs Kimi K2.5
Output tokens cost $3.94 per million on GLM 5.2 and $3.00 per million on Kimi K2.5. Input tokens cost $1.13 per million on GLM 5.2 and $0.60 per million on Kimi K2.5. Cached input tokens are billed at $0.28 per million on GLM 5.2 and $0.11 per million on Kimi K2.5. Context lengths are 1,000,000 tokens on GLM 5.2 and 256,000 tokens on Kimi K2.5. Time to first token (TTFT) measured on AIHubMix is 0.6s on GLM 5.2 and 1.1s on Kimi K2.5. Measured output throughput is 45.1 tok/s on GLM 5.2 and 32.3 tok/s on Kimi K2.5. On the LMArena coding leaderboard GLM 5.2 scores 1505 and Kimi K2.5 scores 1501.
GLM 5.2Kimi K2.5 is the smartest model of Kimi to date, achieving open-source state-of-the-art (SoTA) performance in Agent, coding, visual understanding, and a series of general intelligent tasks. At the same time, Kimi K2.5 is also the most versatile model of Kimi so far, with a native multimodal architecture design that supports both visual and text input, thinking and non-thinking modes, as well as dialogue and Agent tasks.
Pricing & Specifications
Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.
Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.
Activity Past 30 Days
Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.
Tokens / day
Requests / day
Performance Past 3 Days
Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.
Throughput (tok/s)
TTFT (s)
Uptime (%)
LMArena Benchmarks
LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.
Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.
Cost calculator
Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.
Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.
FAQ
Which is cheaper: GLM 5.2, Kimi K2.5?
Kimi K2.5: $3.00/M output tokens; GLM 5.2: $3.94/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.
How do their coding arena scores compare?
GLM 5.2: 1505; Kimi K2.5: 1501 (LMArena coding leaderboard).
Which responds faster?
GLM 5.2: 0.6s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.
How large is each context window?
GLM 5.2 accepts 1,000,000 and Kimi K2.5 accepts 256,000 input tokens.
Which one generates tokens faster?
GLM 5.2 at 45.1 tok/s and Kimi K2.5 at 32.3 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.
What inputs and capabilities does each model support?
GLM 5.2 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Kimi K2.5 accepts text, image and video input and supports thinking, function calling and structured outputs.
Can I call GLM 5.2 and Kimi K2.5 with the same API key?
Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.
Popular comparisons
Related model match-ups readers also look at.
