GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship model for the era of long-horizon tasks. With a truly usable 1M-token context window, it can handle project-level engineering context, execute long-running tasks more reliably, follow engineering standards more consistently, and complete the full development workflow from requirements to multi-platform deployment in a single task.
GLM 5.2 vs Kimi K2 0711
Output tokens cost $3.94 per million on GLM 5.2 and $2.16 per million on Kimi K2 0711. Input tokens cost $1.13 per million on GLM 5.2 and $0.54 per million on Kimi K2 0711. Cached input tokens are billed at $0.28 per million on GLM 5.2 and $0.54 per million on Kimi K2 0711. Context lengths are 1,000,000 tokens on GLM 5.2 and 131,000 tokens on Kimi K2 0711. Time to first token (TTFT) measured on AIHubMix is 1.1s on GLM 5.2 and 0.8s on Kimi K2 0711. Measured output throughput is 37.3 tok/s on GLM 5.2 and 50.2 tok/s on Kimi K2 0711. On the LMArena coding leaderboard GLM 5.2 scores 1505 and Kimi K2 0711 scores 1467.
GLM 5.2Kimi-K2 is a MoE architecture foundational model with extremely powerful coding and agent capabilities, featuring a total of 1 trillion parameters and activating 32 billion parameters. In benchmark performance tests across major categories such as general knowledge reasoning, programming, mathematics, and agents, the K2 model outperforms other mainstream open-source models. The Kimi-K2 model supports a context length of 128k tokens. It does not support visual capabilities.
Pricing & Specifications
Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.
Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.
Activity Past 30 Days
Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.
Tokens / day
Requests / day
Performance Past 3 Days
Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.
Throughput (tok/s)
TTFT (s)
Uptime (%)
LMArena Benchmarks
LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.
Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.
Cost calculator
Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.
Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.
FAQ
Which is cheaper: GLM 5.2, Kimi K2 0711?
Kimi K2 0711: $2.16/M output tokens; GLM 5.2: $3.94/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.
How do their coding arena scores compare?
GLM 5.2: 1505; Kimi K2 0711: 1467 (LMArena coding leaderboard).
Which responds faster?
Kimi K2 0711: 0.8s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.
How large is each context window?
GLM 5.2 accepts 1,000,000 and Kimi K2 0711 accepts 131,000 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on GLM 5.2 and 131,000 tokens on Kimi K2 0711.
Which one generates tokens faster?
Kimi K2 0711 at 50.2 tok/s and GLM 5.2 at 37.3 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.
What inputs and capabilities does each model support?
GLM 5.2 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Kimi K2 0711 accepts text input and supports tool calling, function calling and structured outputs.
Can I call GLM 5.2 and Kimi K2 0711 with the same API key?
Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.
Popular comparisons
Related model match-ups readers also look at.
