Models

GLM 4.6 Vision vs Kimi K3

Compare GLM 4.6 Vision from Z.AI and Kimi K3 from Moonshot AI on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

Z.AIGLM 4.6 VisionMoonshot AIKimi K3
Z.AI logo
GLM 4.6 Vision
Z.AI · text, image, video → text

Zhipu's latest visual reasoning model achieves state-of-the-art visual understanding accuracy at the same scale upon release. It natively supports tool invocation, can automatically complete tasks, supports ultra-long 128K context length, and allows flexible toggling of reasoning.

Input$0.14 /M
Output$0.41 /M
Moonshot AI logo
Kimi K3
Moonshot AI · text, image, video → text

Kimi K3 is Kimi’s flagship model for long-horizon coding and end-to-end knowledge work, with a 1M-token context window and industry-leading intelligence.

Input$3.00 /M
Output$15.00 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

GLM 4.6 Vision
Kimi K3
Input /M
$0.14
$3.00
Output /M
$0.41
$15.00
Cache read /M
$0.03
$0.30
Context length
128,000
1,048,576
Max output
128,000
1,048,576
Time to First Token
11.1 s
0.9 s
Throughput
35.4 tok/s
73.1 tok/s
Modalities
textimagevideo
textimagevideo
Supported Parameters
thinkingfunction callingstructured outputs
API Formats
Released
-
-

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

glm-4.6vkimi-k3

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

glm-4.6vkimi-k3

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

LMArena Benchmarks

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

Text
glm-4.6vkimi-k3
13201380144015001560
Overall
13771486
Coding
14181531
Hard prompts
13831505
Instruction following
13681479
Multi-turn
13671499
Creative writing
13441470
Longer query
13791502
Chinese
15271527
English
13951491

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

GLM 4.6 Vision
$14.39 /mo
Kimi K3
$405 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: GLM 4.6 Vision, Kimi K3?

GLM 4.6 Vision: $0.41/M output tokens; Kimi K3: $15.00/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

How do their coding arena scores compare?

Kimi K3: 1531; GLM 4.6 Vision: 1418 (LMArena coding leaderboard).

Which responds faster?

Kimi K3: 0.9s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

GLM 4.6 Vision accepts 128,000 and Kimi K3 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on GLM 4.6 Vision and 1,048,576 tokens on Kimi K3.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Kimi K3 at 73.1 tok/s and GLM 4.6 Vision at 35.4 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

GLM 4.6 Vision accepts text, image and video input; Kimi K3 accepts text, image and video input and supports thinking, function calling and structured outputs.

Can I call GLM 4.6 Vision and Kimi K3 with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.