Models

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Kimi K3

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash from Google and Kimi K3 from Moonshot AI on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

GoogleGemini 2.5 FlashMoonshot AIKimi K3
Google logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google · text, image, audio, video → text

Gemini 2.5 Flash is Google’s best model in terms of both performance and cost efficiency, offering a comprehensive set of capabilities. It is the first Flash model to support visible reasoning, allowing insight into the thought process behind its responses. With its strong price–performance ratio, the model is well suited for large-scale processing, low-latency, high-throughput tasks that require reasoning, as well as agent-based application scenarios.

Input$0.30 /M
Output$2.50 /M
Moonshot AI logo
Kimi K3
Moonshot AI · text, image, video → text

Kimi K3 is Kimi’s flagship model for long-horizon coding and end-to-end knowledge work, with a 1M-token context window and industry-leading intelligence.

Input$3.00 /M
Output$15.00 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Kimi K3
Input /M
$0.30
$3.00
Output /M
$2.50
$15.00
Cache read /M
$0.03
$0.30
Context length
1,048,576
1,048,576
Max output
65,536
1,048,576
Time to First Token
1.8 s
0.9 s
Throughput
103.6 tok/s
73.1 tok/s
Modalities
textimageaudiovideo
textimagevideo
Supported Parameters
toolsfunction callingstructured outputs
thinkingfunction callingstructured outputs
API Formats
Released
-
-

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

gemini-2.5-flashkimi-k3

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

gemini-2.5-flashkimi-k3

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

LMArena Benchmarks

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

Text
gemini-2.5-flashkimi-k3
1380144015001560
Overall
14101486
Coding
14241531
Math
14061406
Hard prompts
14201505
Instruction following
14011479
Multi-turn
14041499
Creative writing
13971470
Longer query
14191502
Chinese
14441527
English
14121491

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Gemini 2.5 Flash
$55.49 /mo
Kimi K3
$405 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: Gemini 2.5 Flash, Kimi K3?

Gemini 2.5 Flash: $2.50/M output tokens; Kimi K3: $15.00/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

How do their coding arena scores compare?

Kimi K3: 1531; Gemini 2.5 Flash: 1424 (LMArena coding leaderboard).

Which responds faster?

Kimi K3: 0.9s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

Gemini 2.5 Flash accepts 1,048,576 and Kimi K3 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 65,536 tokens on Gemini 2.5 Flash and 1,048,576 tokens on Kimi K3.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Gemini 2.5 Flash at 103.6 tok/s and Kimi K3 at 73.1 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

Gemini 2.5 Flash accepts text, image, audio and video input and supports tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Kimi K3 accepts text, image and video input and supports thinking, function calling and structured outputs.

Can I call Gemini 2.5 Flash and Kimi K3 with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.